Trey Songz has another lawsuit on his hands as two women are accusing him of sexual assaulting them at a house party.
According to TMZ, the pair of unnamed women accused the R&B singer of forcing himself onto them to have non-consensual sex at a Los Angeles party in 2015.
Per the documents, the women met Trey in June 2015 while attending one of his concerts, where they were invited to an afterparty he was hosting.
They say they established a rapport with Songz and were invited to his birthday party at his house later that summer in August.
The women claim they were forced to give up their phones when entering the party. They believe they were drugged as they felt very drunk despite only drinking a “modest” amount.
They claim to have passed out in an upstairs bedroom, only to wake up naked with Trey performing oral sex on one and fingering the other.
Songz allegedly then demanded they all shower together, but when the girls refused, he became enraged and kicked them out the next morning.
Trey Songz’s attorney, Michael Freedman, has denied the allegations, telling TMZ that believes his client’s name will be cleared in court.
“This is yet another example of nearly decade-old allegations being repurposed to take advantage of California’s constitutionally questionable new look back window,” Freedman said. “We look forward to vindicating Trey on the merits in court.”
This is far from the first sexual assault case levied against Trey Songz. The “Bottoms Up” singer is also facing a hefty lawsuit accusing him of assaulting a woman at a 2013 pool party in Connecticut.
The lawsuit is demanding $10 million for sexual battery and assault, which includes claims that Trey allegedly grabbed and exposed the woman’s breast after she merely tried to get a picture with him.
In a video captured by a friend of the accuser — who subsequently sent the video to TMZ — the singer (real name Tremaine Neverson) can be seen grabbing the accuser’s bathing suit top, dropping it, and exposing her breast.
Songz and his legal team have argued that the case was way past the statute of limitations of three years and are awaiting a judge’s ruling on the dismissal motion.
